<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Best Development Tools</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.bstpierre.org/the-best-development-tools/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.bstpierre.org/the-best-development-tools</link>
	<description>Software Development, version 3.0</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 21:52:32 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Olofsen</title>
		<link>http://blog.bstpierre.org/the-best-development-tools/comment-page-1#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Olofsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 01:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bstpierre.org/?p=79#comment-40</guid>
		<description>Great post, couldn&#039;t agree more!!

I&#039;m with Atlassian and we have a great set of development tools, but we would never consider them a suite.  As you say, the best development tools are built for a single purpose, not just to complement something else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, couldn&#8217;t agree more!!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m with Atlassian and we have a great set of development tools, but we would never consider them a suite.  As you say, the best development tools are built for a single purpose, not just to complement something else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://blog.bstpierre.org/the-best-development-tools/comment-page-1#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bstpierre.org/?p=79#comment-37</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the fast response! That&#039;s what we&#039;ve heard from users as well. I&#039;d also say they were impressed with the way Accurev managed process as well, but did recommend using Jira or another bug tracker if we needed more than the basics. New web interface looks pretty cool though. I&#039;ll weigh it in.

Thank you again.

M</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the fast response! That&#8217;s what we&#8217;ve heard from users as well. I&#8217;d also say they were impressed with the way Accurev managed process as well, but did recommend using Jira or another bug tracker if we needed more than the basics. New web interface looks pretty cool though. I&#8217;ll weigh it in.</p>
<p>Thank you again.</p>
<p>M</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian</title>
		<link>http://blog.bstpierre.org/the-best-development-tools/comment-page-1#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bstpierre.org/?p=79#comment-36</guid>
		<description>Mark -

I used Accurev (as an admin and developer) for five years, both VC and the integrated bug tracker (Accuwork).

The VC part of the tool works great. Good value, awesome support, minimal training required for day to day use.

The bug tracker is weak. We used it, and it ended up that we couldn&#039;t really justify migrating away (it wasn&#039;t awful).

If you like the way Accurev does VC, buy it, but don&#039;t use Accuwork. Use their &quot;Accubridge&quot; product to connect Accurev to a real bug tracker.

I can&#039;t speak for their other offerings as we just used Accurev and Accuwork.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark -</p>
<p>I used Accurev (as an admin and developer) for five years, both VC and the integrated bug tracker (Accuwork).</p>
<p>The VC part of the tool works great. Good value, awesome support, minimal training required for day to day use.</p>
<p>The bug tracker is weak. We used it, and it ended up that we couldn&#8217;t really justify migrating away (it wasn&#8217;t awful).</p>
<p>If you like the way Accurev does VC, buy it, but don&#8217;t use Accuwork. Use their &#8220;Accubridge&#8221; product to connect Accurev to a real bug tracker.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t speak for their other offerings as we just used Accurev and Accuwork.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://blog.bstpierre.org/the-best-development-tools/comment-page-1#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bstpierre.org/?p=79#comment-35</guid>
		<description>How would you rate a tool like Accurev which is not just version control, but not full suite ALM either?

http://www.accurev.com

Mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How would you rate a tool like Accurev which is not just version control, but not full suite ALM either?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.accurev.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.accurev.com</a></p>
<p>Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

